The Geologic Column: Evidence for Evolution, or Noah’s Flood?
The Standard Geologic
Column is a hypothetical model of historical geology based on Charles Lyell’s
classic book Principles of Geology,
published in 1830. Rejecting the
biblical catastrophist worldview (Noah’s Flood), Lyell devised a new
interpretive framework that rejected God, rejected the Bible’s record, and
presupposed that presently observed processes were “the key to the past.” Perhaps because rejecting the biblical view also meant rejecting the moral
constraints of the Bible, Lyell’s uniformitarian view rapidly became popular. It soon attracted the particular
attention of Charles Darwin, who was happy to discover vast periods of time to
make his atheistic model of evolution seem plausible.
According to the
evolutionary view, the earth is at least 4.5 billion years old, and the 6-8
mile thick blanket of sedimentary rock that covers the earth only gradually accumulated
over millions of years. Layers in
the “geologic column” are dated by certain index fossils, and reveal the
evolutionary history of the earth just like the rings of a tree. After 150 years of this view dominating
geology, no one questions the beautifully illustrated charts of the standard geologic
column1. The bottom of
the chart generally has pictures of trilobites and other “primitive” sea
creatures, and as the column ascends, arrows point to evolving fish,
amphibians, reptiles, birds, mammals, and finally man, standing at the top of
the evolutionary tree.
Now consider the sedimentary
layers of an actual cliff along the James River in Virginia (pictured). The most
obvious feature is a wide fossil layer containing vast numbers of fossilized
shellfish, as well as fossilized shark teeth. Paleontologists examining the strata confidently assure us
that the fossils are 60 million years old. But how do they know that?
Sedimentary rock cannot be dated by radiology or other independent methods. As
it turns out, paleontologists date fossils by geologic strata, which in this
cliff are believed Devonian. Geologic
strata such as Devonian, however, are themselves dated by index fossils. Since according to the evolution model,
sharks evolved 60 million years ago, the strata must be 60 million years old. In other words, the age of the fossil
is calculated using circular reasoning!
There is no objective way to know the age of the fossils.
Unfortunately for Lyell’s uniformitarian
theory, a tremendous body of research has occurred since 1830. Rather than
supporting his faith that gradual, steady processes occurring normally today were
what produced the geological features observed (uniformitarianism), the
evidence instead suggests that most geological features were the result of
catastrophe. As a result, many
geologists now prefer the term “actualism”, a term that allows for geologic catastrophes.
In his excellent chapter on
the geologic record, Dr. Tasman Walker presents some of the geologic evidence
which not only conflicts with the “old earth” uniformitarianism required for
evolution, but clearly points to a vast, worldwide catastrophe such as depicted
in Noah’s Flood.2
First of all, many
phenomena reflected in sedimentary rock do not require millions of years at all:
the rapid deposition and hardening of sediment during the 1980 Mount St. Helens
eruption made that clear.
Second, many features of
the geologic column point to very rapid deposition, including: non-eroded
ripple marks; the lack of soil formation or bioturbation (signs of plant and
animal life) between layers; undisturbed bedding planes; polystrate fossils
such as trees extending through layers; and clastic dikes, folded rock layers,
and other signs of soft-sediment deformation3.
Third, some geologic
findings simply cannot be explained from an old earth uniformitarian perspective. These include: mass animal graveyards
such as seen in the Dinosaur National Monument, in which many skeletons display
the characteristic “dead dinosaur posture” indicative of being buried alive;
fossil jelly fish, something Darwin thought impossible; rapid experimental
diamond and opal formation; rapid formation of stalactites and stalagmites;
rapid petrification of wood within seven years; and rapid experimental formation
of coal within 1-9 months. Other evidence for catastrophe rather than uniformitarianism
includes: thick sandstone formations; transportation of boulders over great
distances; vast sedimentary blankets which maps show cover thousands of miles;
and increasing evidence that wide granite formations were formed rapidly2.
But what if our absolute
faith in the conventional evolutionary geologic model is shaken? Is there any alternative to millions of
years of gradual, uniformitarian deposition of sediment over the globe,
together with the spontaneous generation of life, and evolution from fish to
man?
Yes, there is. According to Dr. Walker, the ancient biblical
account explains the evidence far better than the evolutionary model of the
standard geologic column. When viewed
with an unprejudiced eye, the sedimentary strata actually fit very well into
the violent, worldwide description of Noah’s Flood. Many phenomena, including the vast coal deposits, polystrate
fossils, and the high pressures seen in gas and oil deposits are also best
explained by a young earth and a catastrophic biblical deluge.
Biblical geologists looking
at the geological layers suggest that the most violent part of Noah’s Flood must
have been initially, when masses of land were broken up, and enormous volcanic
and tectonic upheavals occurred in the crust and mantle. In their scientific model, sediments were
transported by continent-wide water flows, deposited in fine layers, and then
subjected to massive continental erosion, and shaped by the receding
waters. Dr. Walker and others propose
that the geologic column actually represents various stages in the Flood Event,
including the Inundatory Stage and the Recessive Stage2. While biblical geologists do not claim
to have all the answers, Flood Geology has now clearly returned as a realistic
scientific model.
The interpretation of the
geological column, whether biblical or evolutionary, is not merely a scientific
model of academic concern. It is a
matter of great moral implications, which is perhaps why it is so hotly, even
violently contested. And how can
it be ignored, when having an accurate worldview is the most important thing that
determines success in the real world? What if the Bible were true, after all,
and the Christian worldview were the accurate one?
References:
1. Rhodes, Frank. Geology:
A Golden Guide. The Golden Press; New York, 1972, page 152.
2. Walker, Tasman. The Geologic Record,
in Evolution’s Achilles Heels, Robert
Carter, editor, Creation Book Publishers, 2015
3. Morris, John D. Geologic Evidence,
in The Young Earth, Master Books,
1998.
Comments
Post a Comment